See how every record connects to everything else.
A living graph of your quality system: pick any record and see everything it touches — documents, training, equipment, CAPAs, risks.
Every regulated operation is a web of dependencies: results depend on instruments, instruments on calibrations, procedures on training, lots on suppliers. In most organizations that web exists only as tribal knowledge — reconstructed by hand, differently each time, whenever a recall, deviation, or inspection demands it.
Impact analysis is where it hurts: a failed reagent lot, and the question "what did this touch?" takes a war room. The organizations that answer in minutes are not smarter — their records were connected when they were created.
Almost every framework is a traceability demand in disguise: Part 11 wants records attributable and linked to their signatures; ISO 13485 wants product traced through production; AABB requires blood component traceability from donor to recipient; recall regulations assume you can enumerate affected product. None of them name a diagram — all of them test whether the connections exist.
Kintavo builds the graph as a side effect of normal work: every transaction, assignment, and signature is born linked. The Compliance Map is the view; the linkage is the platform.
A control lot fails at 9:12 a.m. The QC lead opens the lot’s map and follows its connections — the runs that consumed it, the analyzers involved, the operators who signed. The linked records attach to the deviation before the 10 a.m. huddle, and the investigation starts from evidence instead of a blank spreadsheet.
360° Compliance Map™ shares the same data model, AI engine, and audit trail as the other eighteen modules — so its records see, and are seen by, everything else in your quality system.
No. Links are created by transactions as work happens — a consume, a calibration, a training completion. The map is a view of the data, not a diagram someone maintains.
From any starting record, you navigate its connections in both directions and export the linked set — so impact assessment starts from assembled records instead of a blank spreadsheet.
A report is assembled after the fact and is only as complete as its author. The map’s edges are the transactions themselves — completeness is structural.
Migrated records join the graph with the linkage present in your legacy data; new connections accrue from go-live forward. History gets no worse, and everything new is born linked.